备考指南GMAT优秀作文
The following appeared as part of an article in a magazine on lifestyles.
Two years ago, City L was listed 14th in an annual survey that ranks cities according to the quality of life that can be enjoyed by those living in them. This information will enable people who are moving to the state in which City L is located to confidently identify one place, at least, where schools are good, housing is affordable, people are friendly, the environment is safe, and the arts flourish.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
The author concludes that City L has good schools, affordable housing, friendly people, flourishing arts and a safe environment. To support this claim the author cites an annual survey that ranks cities according to quality of life. Two years ago City L was listed 14th in this survey. As it stands this argument is unconvincing.
First, the author fails to indicate what individual characteristics of cities were used as criteria for the ranking. To the extent that the criteria used in the survey were the same as the features listed by the author in the conclusion, the conclusion would be warranted. On the other hand, if the survey employed entirely different criteriafor example, outdoor recreational opportunities or educational achievement levels of adult residentsthen the authors conclusion would be wholly unwarranted.
【备考指南GMAT优秀作文】相关文章：
GMAT阅读备考指南08-08
GMAT备考优秀作文09-20
备考GMAT优秀作文09-19
gmat优秀作文作文备考07-23
GMAT优秀作文备考精选10-03
GMAT备考优秀作文精选09-24
备考资料GMAT优秀作文09-24
GMAT优秀作文备考资料07-26
GMAT作文优秀备考资料07-26