英语辩论题目

精选英语辩论题目

　　英语辩论赛越来越普遍，大家一定还是需要一些英语辩论题目的。下面是小编搜集整理的精选英语辩论题目，欢迎阅读。更多资讯请继续关注辩论赛栏目!

　　英语辩论题目

　　CLASS assignment at a Guangzhou university has provoked controversy after local press reported that a professor asked students to design a hypothetical plan to rob a bank. The professor said the same assignment had been used at the Harvard Business School to train students how to manage human resources.

　　Many shocked commentators have criticized the assignment as absurd. They suggest that it may even encourage students to commit crime. Such a project wouldn't have any educational value, they argue. Others say that robbing a bank is not necessarily an innovative idea for a college class project; it only shows that the educator has run out of legitimate ideas and methods.

　　However, a greater number of other commentators support the project. They suggest that such unconventional methods will capture students' imaginations and make the class more interesting.

　　Students, too, came to the professor's defense, saying it was a very inventive project from which they learned a lot.

　　Do you think this is a project that should be assigned to a college class?

　　Yes

　　It won't turn students into bank robbers. There's no need to make such a fuss over it.

　　1. College students are adults with a well-grounded sense of right and wrong. Simply being asked by a professor to write a plan for robbing a bank isn't going to provoke them to do carry it out.

　　2. Not every lesson in a college class has to be about morals or social values. Academic freedom means professors can give students assignments like this, as long as they are challenging and educational.

　　3. The main problem with the Chinese educational system is its lack of innovation and fresh ideas. Students have been taught for decades to simply recite and repeat. This project is an example of educational innovation and should be encouraged, not criticized.

　　No

　　There are better ways to be innovative in the classroom than designing a bank robbery.

　　1. A bank robbery, however hypothetical, usually involves violence. Although college students probably wouldn't carry out such an act, encouraging them to plan violence is inappropriate.

　　2. There are better ways to stimulate students' imagination and critical thinking. The fact that the professor chose this particular case means that he is not sensitive enough to the students' real needs.

　　3. Just because the assignment was used at a US college doesn't mean it's suitable for a Chinese university class. Borrowing "revolutionary" educational methods from abroad without adapting them to the situation in China can lead to problems.

　　hypothetical假设的

　　innovative创新的

　　legitimate合理的

　　recite背诵

　　延伸阅读：英语辩论赛流程

　　1、主席致辞：宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料;介绍选手包括学院、专业、年级及正反方所持观点等;介绍评委及比赛规则。

　　2.、比赛阶段：

　　1)正方一辩发言(7分钟)

　　第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第六分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时---举牌提示

　　2)反方一辩发言(8分钟)

　　第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示

　　3)正方二辩发言(8分钟)

　　第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示

　　4)反方二辩发言(8分钟)

　　第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示

　　5)反方一辩总结(4分钟)

　　第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第三分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时---举牌提示

　　6)正方一辩总结(5分钟)

　　第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时--举牌提示,第五分钟结束时---举牌提示

　　注意事项:

　　在提示牌提示结束后,有20秒宽限期,发言者必须在此期间内完成自己的发言,如果超过宽限期,则扣分.如果发言者发言时间远远少于规定时间,则评委会将此看作没有充分展开自己的观点而给发言者扣分.

　　在前1-4环节中,对方可以根据发言者正在申诉的论点提出本方的观点(point of information,简称为POI)提问者提出POI的注意事项:

　　1)POI要简短，切题，机智。严禁针对比赛规则和个人提出问题;

　　2)提出POI时要从座位上起立，并举手示意.提问者可以用类似on that point,Sir/Madam的话引起发言者的注意;

　　3)发言者可以采取以下方式回应对方提出的POI:语言拒绝(类似sorry)、接受提问(类似ok);

　　4)如果提出POI的要求被发言者接受，那么POI的陈述要以澄清事实或提出评论为形式，用一两句话在15秒内表达出来;如果被发言者拒绝，那么提问者坐回原位，准备下一次提问;

　　5)POI只能在前四个环节中提出，最后两个环节不能提出，前四个环节内第一分钟和最后一分钟内不可以提出POI;

　　6)发言者如果接受POI，那么就应针对提问并围绕自己的发言回答问题;

　　7)除非要提出POI，否则没有轮到发言的辩手不得在别人发言时起立。如果辩手违反规则提问或有扰乱正常比赛的行为，那么此选手将被主持人宣布犯规;

　　8)评价POI的提出是否得当，应该看它对正反两方接下来的'辩论的影响如何;

　　9)发言者在发言时须至少接受2次POI，提问者至少要站起4次示意提POI。辩手若没有抓住机会提POI或者在发言中没有接受POI，评委可酌情扣分;

　　3、观众提问:观众可向正反方各提一个问题，由双方选派一名选手作答。该环节在正式比赛结束后进行，增加比赛观赏性，不影响比赛结果。

　　4、评判团评议裁决：由一名评委进行点评，向辩论赛主席递交比赛结果。附评分标准

　　5、评分标准

　　1)内容:观点陈述明确，有条理，论点和论据内容是否正确、充实，引用资料和实例是否恰当。 30%

　　2)技巧:语言连贯，反应迅速，辩手语言是否流畅，说理、分析是否透彻，反驳和应变能力是否强，说服力和逻辑性是否强。 20%

　　3)各队在POI环节中的识辩能力、说明能力和逻辑性是否强，接句是否合适，回答是否中肯，反驱是否有力、有理，反应是否机敏，用语是否得体。 20%

　　4)遵守比赛规则，准确把握时间。 10%

　　5)形象气质：仪表，着装整齐辩手的表情、动作是否恰当，是否有风度及幽默感。 10%

　　6)团队合作：全队各辩手的论点是否一致，结构是否完整，队员之间的配合、合作是否默契。 10%

【精选英语辩论题目】相关文章：

德育答辩论文题目09-18

小学英语阅读训练题目精选10-01

英语阅读题目11-21

小学英语手抄报题目精选07-30

大学英语辩论策划方案08-29

解读英语写作题目11-21

海信面试英语题目09-19

英语翻译论文题目06-13

关于英语辩论赛的技巧01-21

新生辩论赛辩论技巧-辩论赛12-31