论两大法系刑事诉讼制度之比较

论两大法系刑事诉讼制度之比较

摘  要

随着资本主义的产生和发展,对资本主义法律影响最大的法系是民法法系和普通法系，这是西方国家的两大法系。在阶级本质、总的指导思想和基本原则方面，它们都是1致的，但在其他方面却存在着很多差别。诸多的差异是由于两大法系不同的历史渊源而造成的，以下将重点从两大法系的侦查程序功能、证据制度、刑事证明标准制度3方面来加以探讨。

关键字：普通法法系；民法法系；侦查程序功能；证据制度；
刑事证明标准制度

Abstract
 
     That is law, which is the most influencing capitalism law, following the coming into being of capitalism law and development, is civil law and common law. They are two of systems in the west countries. They are the same in the class essence, total guidance thinking and basic principle side, but in the other sides, it exists many differences. The differences is caused by their different history background, so is the criminal litigation institution. The article will centrally probe into it according to three issues of spying into process function , witness institution and criminal prove institution.

     Key words: common law; civil law; spying into process function; witness institution; criminal prove institution
..............................
注：【包括：毕业论文，任务书，开题报告】

【论两大法系刑事诉讼制度之比较】相关文章：

大陆法系的刑事诉讼行为理论-兼论对我国的鉴戒价值03-22

论刑事诉讼的“中立”理念03-19

论刑事诉讼之言词原则03-06

论刑事诉讼中的免证事实03-28

论刑事诉讼“物”的内涵、特性及功能03-23

论李白之“气”03-27

论体育之美学02-27

论民事之诉03-20

朱熹与王夫之的性情论之比较03-18