“茅盾文学奖”评奖的思考

关于“茅盾文学奖”评奖的思考

摘   要

茅盾文学奖的评奖标准包括文学因素和非文学因素。茅盾文学奖对中国文坛产生了积极影响，作出了重要贡献。茅盾文学奖评奖存在着不合理的需要改进的方面包括：茅盾文学奖评奖的评委组成、评选程序、对文学精品的认识问题等。针对茅盾文学奖存在的缺陷，应对茅盾文学奖的评选作进1步的改进，以发挥茅盾文学奖对文学创作的激励和引领作用，使茅盾文学奖的评选具有更多的公信力和更高的威望。
    关键词：茅盾文学奖；评奖；思考
 

ABSTRACT
 
The appraisal standards of MaoDun Literary Prize comprises the literary and nonliterary facts. The positive effects and great contribution of MaoDun Literary Prize on Chinese literary circles are affirmed, and the point of view that MaoDun Literary Prize still needs improvement is expressed. Suggestions are for the constitute of the evaluation committee, procedure of the evaluation committee, awareness of the top quality novels. Through the above discussions on its effects and limitations, this paper intends to accelerate the leading and encouraging function of MaoDun Literary Prize on literary works, and make it more credible.
    Key words: Mao Dun literature prize; Appraisal; Ponder

 

【“茅盾文学奖”评奖的思考】相关文章：

语言文学毕业论文-关于“茅盾文学奖”评奖的思考03-04

关于国学的思考12-05

非婚同居的法律思考03-13

对舞蹈教育的多元思考03-07

关于“国学热”的思考03-07

对培养审计人才的思考03-08

对品牌授权经营的思考03-18

极限思想的辩证思考03-07

浅谈药师立法的思考03-24