- 相关推荐
9月24日雅思写作真题作文（通用10篇）
无论在学习、工作或是生活中，大家都写过作文吧，借助作文可以提高我们的语言组织能力。相信很多朋友都对写作文感到非常苦恼吧，以下是小编为大家收集的9月24日雅思写作真题作文，欢迎大家分享。
9月24日雅思写作真题作文 1
Undeniably, indifference and ignorance find their way into neighborhoods. In the essay, the underlying reasons and the practical moves will be expounded.
The primary factor leading to the significant alienation among neighbors is the prosperity of economy. In the past, individuals heavily relied on the community to rear livestock or grow rice and vegetables while in the present, people depend on themselves to work in the office and have meals in the restaurant. More importantly, to ensure an advantageous position in the face of stiff competition, employees have to spend the majority of their time working in office or at home, so they cannot afford to spare time gossiping about weather, dogs and new babies with other occupants.
Another contributing element is the intrusion of a variety of entertainments brought by advancing technology. Previously, the single recreation form of television forces residents to watch one film together. Currently, portable devices such as I-Phone, I-Pad, Kindle enable inhabitants to live in the virtual communities created by social networking websites, so they distain to socialize with other dwellers in real life.
To reverse the tendency, the government and the community committee should stand out and shoulder their responsibilities correspondingly. For one thing, the government can invite advertising agencies to design public service advertisements to raise peoples awareness of community. For another, the community committee should launch mini-games or sports activities regularly or on festivals or holidays, so as to engage more denizens in the neighborhood.
In a nutshell, a supportive community is gradually turned into a lonely island by a self-reliant and competitive economic pattern and diversified technological innovations, the status quo that can only be altered by the endeavors of both the authority and the community leaders.
9月24日雅思写作真题作文 2
A common phenomenon of the modern society is that a growing number of people know little about their neighbors, although they live in the same community for many years. I think that modern lifestyles are probably responsible for this.
In large cities, people spend the daytime in the office and have dinner in the restaurant, rarely seeing their neighbors. Even when people meet their neighbors occasionally, they do not greet each other. As many people are busy pursuing fame and fortune and have high stress in their daily lives, they become apathetic to other people and unwilling to interact with their neighbors.
Another reason is that peoples social life seems to be dominated by the computer and the mobile phone. Many people live in the virtual space and ignore the communication with others in real life. They would rather communicate with strangers on the web than invite their neighbors to their houses for a chat.
Some experts are concerned that the lack of communication between neighbors would lead to a sense of social isolation and measures should betaken to change this situation.One possible approach would be for the government to produce some public service advertisements to raise peoples awareness Of the importance of good relationship with neighbors. For example, when an old person falls ill and his child is out at work, his neighbors can offer help in time.
The community committee should also play an active role in improving the relationship between neighbors. If more entertainment and sports activities were organized in the community, people would have more opportunities to socialize with their neighbors and they are more likely to create a harmonious community together.
9月24日雅思写作真题作文 3
Unsurprisingly, a growing number of citizens are thoughtless and indifferent to their neighbors, contributing to undoubtedly. Lacking a sense of community. The essay aims to explore looming reasons and come up with effective measures to solve this problem.
Firstly, the situation of individuals knowing little about their neighbors is mainly attributed to the pace of modern life. Under great living pressure, many people have to go to work early and share little time with their neighbors, especially those who live far from their workplaces because of traffic congestion. Besides, more and more people are accustomed to having meals in restaurants such as fast food restaurants instead of going back home, not to mention exhaustion they get after working the whole day, resulting in lower possibility of meeting and communicating with neighbors.
On the other hand, an essay access to cutting-edge functions of mobile phones such as online shopping and looking through twitter and so on leads to ignoring communication with familiar person around them even sitting in front of the table and having a meal, let alone spending time with neighbors.
It is high time to take constructive measures to prevent the phenomenon from getting worse. First and foremost, the community committee is suggested to organize innovative activities in the community to attract more residents to attend and recognize with each other. In addition, the government and mass media are supposed to spread the significance of socializing with neighbors by various kinds of advertisements, such as TV commercials and bus posters, in order to strengthen individuals’ awareness of maintaining harmonious relationship with neighbors.
9月24日雅思写作真题作文 4
In the current era, there is a phenomenon that urban residents are not eager to communicate with their neighbors and they do not have a sense of community. This essay may examine the possible reasons and potential solutions to reversing this tendency.
To begin with, modern technologies may attract individuals’ attention than face-to-face communication does. It is acknowledged that online communities have developed and become a fad among the public. For many citizens, they can bear staying at home for several days without meeting others, but they may suffer from no access to the Internet since they need to communicate with other online friends. Then, residents actually have a sense of community, but what they care about is virtual communities, not traditional communities any more.
In addition, urban inhabitants may have insufficient time and vigor to interact with people nearby. Compared to workers in rural areas, employees in downtown may be more occupied their work and working overtime may not be a rare case. When these exhausted employees arrive at their own home, what they want is to take a shower and sleep immediately. Thus, too much working burden actually hinders people from communicating with others, which leads to that they do not take their communities seriously.
As for addiction to the Internet, governments could encourage communities to hold more face-to-face activities. For example, some sport games, such as playing badminton in communities, could be supported and promoted by governments and governments could emphasize on that lacking exercise may lead to a series of diseases, such as obesity. Then, more citizens may be willing to go out and take part in more community activities. In terms of tired workers, guaranteeing holidays and other necessary rights of employees should be one of the top priorities for the authorities. Subsequently, workers may have their private lives since they do not spend all their time on working anymore, which allows them to join in community activities as well.
In sum, the popularity of online communities and tiredness due to working excessively may account for why individuals in cities may not care about their communities. In order to tackle this issue, encouraging engagement on offline events and guaranteeing employees’ leisure time should be considered by governments.
9月24日雅思写作真题作文 5
Sample answer：
In recent years, animal protection has become an issue of concern. People take different attitudes towards the increasing attention and expenditure on wildlife conservation. Some people suggest that the spending should be redirected to helping other fields in society. I agree with the view that the investment in wildlife protection is not worthwhile.
Animals, as a key component of the whole food chain, have a profound impact on the sustainability of an ecosystem. As we known, every kind of animals plays an important role in natural balance. For instance, the demise of any species will lead to the growth or decline of other species. In some extreme cases, some species may at the verge of extinction such as Dodo bird. If people did not take actions to protect wildlife as soon as possible, we humans would be affected in the end.
However, there are more issues that we need to focus in our society rather than protecting animals. In current social context, the primary task is still to improve living standards since there are many people living under the poverty line. Only when people are in a good living condition, can they pay attention to other social problems. Besides, technology and education are another two aspects of governments to concern. These two industries accelerate the development of society, which will provide a better protection for wildlife in turn.
In conclusion, although the animal is a significant part of ecosystem, it is better for governments to invest more finance and resources in other social problems.
9月24日雅思写作真题作文 6
Environmental problems are so big that they cannot be solved by any person or country alone. Instead, it should be solved at international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Environmental degradation has been recognized as one of the main challenges that we have to overcome in the 21st century. The rapid deterioration of environmental problems is believed to have posed a serious threat to our survival. To address this concern, countries worldwide should join forces, instead of working individually for their own target.
People support international cooperation for two reasons. The first point is the impact of environmental problem is normally on a global scale. It is common knowledge that we share the same biosphere, its components are interrelated. For example, a stream in one country can be polluted by the sewage dumped by its neighboring country. In other words, one country’s effort to reduce pollution can be futile if other countries are not involved. It should also noted that some countries do not have adequate resources to reduce pollution, even though these countries realize the importance of environmental protection. These countries can cooperate with developed countries, introduce technologies and draw on experiences so as to implement environmentally friendly policies continuously.
Despite the importance of international cooperation, countries should take the initiative to implement some changes. It is fair to say that countries are confronted with different environmental problem. For example, greenhouse gas emissions in China are mainly created by the electricity generation industries while in the United States are primarily attributed to the increase in car use. The technologies and methods that are globally applicable may not be effective in some countries.In addition, countries should enforce some environmental laws and raise citizens’ awareness so as to restore the environment.
To summaries, countries should make a join effort not only because the ecosystem is a unified mechanism but also because it can make optimal use of financial and human resources. Country’s resource commitment is also important at regional or national level.
In some countries, it is possible for people to buy products made in other countries. To what extent do the benefits of this development outweigh the problems?
As the world is increasingly globalised, the exchange of commodities across the border is proceeding at an astounding rate. It has sparked controversy over whether the increase in imports has adverse impacts. From my point of view, this practice’s advantages outweigh its disadvantages.
Importing goods can yield a number of benefits. The first benefit is that despite the high cost of transportation, imports are competitively priced. The main reason is that the countries that export these goods normally have technology and professional knowledge to ensure the goods’ quality and affordability. For example, China specialises in the production of textile products so China-made textile products are cheaper than local counterparts in many parts of the world. Besides, imported goods have challenged domestic manufacturers’ dominance and intensified competition, thereby prompting these manufacturers to lower product prices. It is beneficial to domestic customers, because products are more affordable and the cost of living will decline.
On the other hand, the downside of importing goods is that the excessive reliance on imports is likely to lead to the underdevelopment of some domestic industries. For instance, many countries import computers, resulting in domestic manufactures’ bankruptcy. This is harmful to the development of a self-contained economy, and also likely to trigger massive job cuts. Another problem is that transportation may create considerable pollution, especially when it involves air freight. It will degrade air quality and also lead to other environment issues, such as global warming.
It is therefore reasonable to think that the advantages of importing of commodities should be accepted with caution. Although customers are able to acquire commodities at lower cost, countries also need to pay attention to the development of their respective industries.
Some people believe that charities should give aid to those who need the aid most, wherever they live. Some people believe that charity organisations would better concentrate on people in their own countries instead. Discuss both views and give your own pinion.
Concern about humanitarian has been heightened in recent years. Although international aid illustrates a moral ideal of mankind, many people who hold the opposing views think that the welfare of fellow citizens is the priority. International aid has its weaknesses but its importance should not be denied.
The main reason why international donation agencies should view international aid from a global perspectives is that their funds can help the citizens of those recipient countries to combat poverty, disease and inequality. We should recognise that citizens of developing countries are in desperate need of aid, because they are susceptible to natural or man-made disasters such as wars. In those war-ton or poverty-stricken countries, resources are extremely scarce, which demand for food, medicine, tents and shelters.
Despite the importance of helping those beyond our national borders, it is reasonable to lend a hand to our fellow citizens. Even in the richest countries, there are some disadvantaged people whose needs for daily necessities are not met. If we can solve problems on our doorstep, low income people can have basic living standards and this is beneficial to social stability.
From my personal perspective, humanitarian action can restore some of their basic rights, such as the right to receive education, in recipient countries. This is consistent with the universal principle of supporting vulnerable populations. Those who cannot provide financial support can work as aid workers and deliver services to those needy people.
To summaries, we should realise the implications of international aid to those who are affected by disasters, poverty and misfortunes. We can deliver aid to other countries to show compassion, although helping local beneficiaries is important.
The tourist industry has been expanding in some countries and international tourism has benefited these countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, tourism has become an important industry and has brought unprecedented opportunities to these countries. However, the impact of tourism on these countries remains a source of constant debate. The essay will elaborate on both positive and negative impacts of tourism.
The implications of tourism for some countries are two fold. First of all, it should be recognised that the development of tourism stimulates economic growth by generating enormous employment opportunities and increasing foreign exchange earnings. This benefit is particularly valuable to those impoverished countries, whose citizens are jobless, malnourished and ill-housed. Tourism provides a driving force for the development of various industries such as hospitality, transportation, communications, retail sales and manufacture, which require substantial capital investments. Without the revenues created by tourism, these industries are not likely to develop and the economic growth will be sluggish. Furthermore, tourism provides economic incentives for cultural preservation, because some places of cultural importance,e.g., historical sites,remain the most popular destinations.Those who express concerns about the negative effect of tourism should realise that tourism revenues can be used to protect cultural or historical heritage and also the local landscape.
On the negative side, environmental destruction is one problem that arises from international tourism. The construction of infrastructure and tourism facilities(including airports, roads,hotels and resorts) will destroy environmental resources. Another problem associated with tourism is that it can threaten the local culture. The arrival of tourists can disrupt the life of local people, who abandon their traditional livelihoods and start to work in the tourism industry. It is also true that in many places, local people do not embrace tourism with open arms. Due to a lack of understanding of local customs, tourists might display some impolite or even offensive behaviour, which can lead to local people’s unhappiness or hostility.
In the light of these facts, we can come to the conclusion that tourism can help some countries reap benefits although these countries may have to accept social and environmental costs. These countries should promote culturally appropriate activities and require tourists to show respect for the local life, traditions and natural scenery.
English has become a universal language. Do you think that the positive effects of the trend outweigh negative effects?
At the present time, the role of English as a global language is indispensable, but it is worth mentioning that the prevalence of English worldwide might have its negative effect. In my opinion, English’s dominance can be viewed in a positive light.
It is unquestionable that the extensive use of English worldwide helps promote international cooperation, as language constitutes the biggest barrier to people’s communication in the global setting. For example, if a company’s financial statements are written in English, any investor who has a good command of English is able to read this company’s documents and understand this company’s operation, whether or not English is their first language. That’s why English has been recognised as the main language by many international conferences and academic groups. Around 80 per cent of websites in the world present their information in English. It would be no exaggeration to say that those who do not speak English find it difficult to survive in the global community. By contrast, people who have proficiency in two languages( English plus their native language) can easily find jobs, collect information and travel overseas.
Despite the contribution of the English language to globalisation, it is considered the main culprit of the loss of language diversity. The idea lies in the fact that many English learners, such as those who move to English-speaking countries, speak their native language less frequently. It should also be noted that English, as the favorite language for international media, conveys English-speaking countries’ lifestyles, values and beliefs to different parts of the world. It might affect the world’s cultural diversify.
In spite of this, I am convinced that English is able to bridge the language gap and introduce minority cultures to the world, thereby protecting these cultures.
In conclusion, English plays a vital role in communication and cooperation among people from different countries. Although some people suspect that English will endanger some minority languages. This claim is not supported with evidence. The reality is that English sometimes assists us protecting cultural heritage.
Many countries spend a lot of money in art. Some people think investment in art is necessary, but others say money is better spent public services and facilities. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Government sponsorship for arts is a controversial issue, especially when the state is confronted with budget problems. There who object to public funds for arts believe that money should be diverted to the construction of public facilities. I am of the opinion that the government should take citizens’ benefits into consideration and adjust the spending on art or infrastructures accordingly.
It is important to realise that art is an essential component of cultural legacy, so the protection and development of art has important implications to cultural diversity. In terms of painting, for example, styles, genres, tools and materials differ from culture to culture. An art form is likely to disappear, if it is not well protected.
Despite the importance of art, public facilities deserve more of government spending than art. Citizens are interested in the availability of public facilities, such as water and electricity supply, schools, libraries and roads, which have a direct impact on their daily lives. By contrast, for most people, sculptures, paintings or operas are luxury items, which cannot bring tangible benefit to them. Therefore, it is pointless to support the use of public funds for this purpose, if basic facilities are underfunded and ill-equipped to meet public needs.
I personally think that the arts should get public money, because it boosts the appeal of the built environment, reflected in the diversity of architecture and landscaping. If we are exposed to visually attractive objects everyday, we can enjoy peace of mind and feel an increased level of satisfaction with life. People will be less likely to commit violent or anti-social behaviors, and this is beneficial to community cohesion.
In the light of the facts outlined above, government investment in the arts is essential to cultural diversity and the visual appeal of the built environment. However, in those countries whose infrastructure is inadequate, spending cuts on the arts are justifiable.
Instead of asking the government to bear the cost of higher education, students should pay tuition fees themselves. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The government has long been the major founder of university education. Those people who support government spending on education think that some students do not enroll because of learning costs. My view is that students’ personal situations should be considered, before the government decides whether to offer free education.
It is worth noting that university education is the key to bridging the income gap. There are numerous students, especially those from low income families, who cannot afford educational expenses. For example, students who study architecture or medical science may spend many years in the university, which is an expensive choice for them. Because of financial constraints, people of low socio-economic status are at a disadvantage in terms of educational opportunities and career development. If the government provides free access to education, children from disadvantaged backgrounds can get into the college and find decent jobs in future.This can close the social divide and create a prosperous country.
Even though government sponsorship can inspire people to receive tertiary education, it can also cause the waste of public resources. Free education may be a reason why many students are reluctant to complete their courses and enter the workforce at the earliest date. It not only imposes a burden on the country but also affects state funding for other sectors(e.g., primary and secondary education). Another problem is that, because of financial pressures, universities cannot upgrade facilities and recruit well-qualified lecturers, which can have a negative impact on students’ academic achievement.
To summarise, government should provide financial support according to students’ needs to ensure that they have access to education. However, tuition fees are applicable to most students, especially those from middle to high income families, as it helps maintain the quality of tertiary education.
Some people say that the government should ensure that people lead a healthy life, while others believe that individuals should have their own choices. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Healthy lifestyle is very important because it relevant to dignity and happiness. It is suggested that people are unlikely to adopt healthy lifestyle, unless the government takes some actions. My view is that lifestyle should be decided by people themselves, despite the importance of the government’s guidance and intervention.
It is reasonable to argue that if people can choose their lifestyles freely, it reflects the respect for basic human rights. People who are obsessed with how to comply with government regulations will live under tremendous pressure. Although people are encouraged to eat vegetables and adopt a balanced diet, it does not mean that laws should specify the proportion of vegetables in diet. It not only poses a threat to their health, but also causes their resentment against the government.
On the other hand, it is important for the government to impose restrictions on some habits, especially those that are widely believed to be damaging. This is due to the fact that most people have difficulty in disciplining themselves and cannot refrain from some unhealthy habits. For example, it is common knowledge smoking is harmful to people’s health but many people have problems ceasing smoking. The consequence is that their behaviour not only damage their own health but also has an adverse effect on others. Their reliance on medical care leads to overconsumption of resources and a higher demand for the use of taxpayers’ money; this is unfair to those who follow healthy habits.
Overall, I believe that one’s freedom to choose lifestyles should be protected provided that it dose not interfere with other people. The primary role of the government is to provide information rather than to regulate citizens’ behaviour. This is important especially when citizens do not realise the health consequences of their habits and their problems can put pressure on the health service.
The society is based on rules and laws. The society would not function well if individuals were free to do whatever they want. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Laws refer to the rules imposed on human beings. Although the laws is important in regulating people’s behaviour, many people argue that it restricts individuals’ freedom. I think that it is necessary to gain a comprehensive understanding of the functions of law in society and its demerits.
It is an undeniable fact that the law informs citizens of the rules that are recognized by the whole society. The essential point of formulating laws is that laws can prevent one from engaging in actions that are harmful to other people. Anybody who fails to comply with laws will be punished, so the law helps establish a harmonious society. For example, people may commit robberies and murder because of jealous, greed and hatred. If these actions were accepted on the grounds of personal choice, it would be detrimental to other people’s interest. It is also true that many ethical standards, such as those standards that emphasis honesty, loyalty and compassion, enhance social cohesion.
Nevertheless, laws sometimes inevitably infringe upon human’s freedom and even hamper social development. For instance, if one country has many limits on the business world, the business activity will not be active. High income earners who are subject income tax rates may lack motivation to make greater efforts to increase their income. It is also the case that in a society where personal freedoms, such as the freedom of speech are limited, it is impossible to have different voices heard and solve problem efficiently.
It is reasonable to conclude that society cannot operate well without laws and rules. Even though the law does not allow people to act at will, the main purpose is to create a society where people can live in harmony.
9月24日雅思写作真题作文 7
Introduce the mentioned opinion and give your own opinion.In recent years, animal protection has become an issue of concern. People take different attitudes toward the increasing attention and expenditure on wildlife
conservation. Some People suggest that the spending should be redirected to helping other fields in our society. I agree with the view that the investment in wildlife protection is not worthwhile.
Give specific Reason and details for the opinion mentioned in the question.
Animals, as a key component of the whole food chain, have a profound impact on the sustainability of an ecosystem. As we know, every kind of animals plays an important role in natural balance.For example, the demise of any species will lead to the species will lead to the growth or decline of other species.In some extreme cases,some species may be at the verge of extinction such as Dodo bird. If people did not take actions to protect wildlife as soon as possible, we humans will be affected in the end.
Give specific Reason and details for the opinion of yourself.
However, there are more issues that we need to focus in our society rather than protecting animals.In current social context,the primacy task is still to improve living standards since there are many people living under the poverty line.Only when people are in a good living condition can they pay attention to other social problems.Besides technology and education are another two aspects for governments to concern, These two industries accelerate the development of society, which will provide a better protection for wildlife in turn.
In conclusion, although the animal is a significant part of ecosystem, it’s better for governments to invest more finance and resources in other social problems.
9月24日雅思写作真题作文 8
Most senior citizens retire or no longer work full-time. They usually live in their own houses not far from their childrens, while the children of a few senior citizens have gone abroad and work or study far beyond the oceans. For certain senior citizens, tile years after retirement are not very enjoyable. First, they feel that their lives lose meaning for being at home all day. In addition, they may feel lonely, especially those without children around. Moreover, they become more concerned with their health, as they grow older, and worry a lot about their safety. At the same time, many senior citizens enjoy their lives. They feel free to do things they were not able to do when they were working and raising their families. They spend their time travelling, doing exercises or watching TV. They get together with their fellow members who have the common interests and equal free time.
In fact, there are some still continuing their work, not just for money, but to show their value. However, no one really wants to be old, and perhaps all like to be young forever.
9月24日雅思写作真题作文 9
Dolphin is my favourite animal. It is one of the most precious animals. Their bodies are very long, about one zhang. Dolphins live in the sea. They live on fish, shrimps and so on. Dolphins are very friendly and peaceful. They never attack people. Instead, they have saved many people in danger in the past years. How helpful the dolphins are! Dolphins are very clever. People often train them so that they can give a dolphin show which brings people a lot of happiness and joy. Unluckily, the number of dolphins is getting smaller and smaller. Because of water pollution, there is less and less space for dolphins. Many people make money by hunting dolphins. If we don’t protect them, maybe we’ll lose our good friends one day. As a student, I hope more and more people should take actions to protect dolphins.
9月24日雅思写作真题作文 10
Air transport is commonly used to move fruits and vegetables to places where those farm products can’t grow or are out of season. The benefits of such business are obvious, but air transport also creates a number of problems.
Transport of fruits and vegetables by air enables consumers to enjoy a wider variety of fresh and in-season farm products from all over the world. Not only is air transport good for consumers, it is also a blessing for farmers because the market is no longer restricted by regions. As a result, air transport increases the sale volume by selling more products in more places.
Moreover, air transport of food has now become a major resource of incomes for air companies. In the past, air companies’ business mainly came from serving passengers. However, facing an increasingly tough market, air companies need to expand their share of market to serve a wider range of customers in order to stay in the game and make a profit. With a booming economy and more money to spend, people create a great potential for food transport business and good margin for air companies.
In spite of such benefits, air transport is not free of problems. One major issue is high cost. Air transport is probably the most expensive way of transport. Higher costs entail high prices, which in turn deprive people with less money the opportunities to enjoy such privileges. So air transported food is now for the rich, a fact that is unfair for poor people.
In addition, it is not the best option to solve problems by transporting food from outside for places where certain kinds of fruits does not grow. The most optimal way, it seems to me, is that we should change the environment required by such plants using scientific and biological methods such as creating suitable soil and temperature. Such solutions will be proven to be ultimately cost-effective and fundamental.
More importantly, research indicates that air transport pollutes the environment. For example, Britain transports half its food by air. However one kilo New Zealand fruit emits five kilo warm house gas on its way to destination. Therefore, some environmental groups and books advocate people to distinguish local fruit and air-transported fruit in an effort to cut the pollution from food consumption.
In conclusion, air transport has many benefits for consumers and farmers, but it also has problems such as high cost and pollution. More effective and environmental friendly solution should be found to address such problems.
【9月24日雅思写作真题作文】相关文章：
雅思写作考试真题范文（通用28篇）05-12
2016年1月雅思写作真题范文03-11
2016年3月雅思写作真题大作文03-11
2017年雅思真题作文03-27
雅思大作文真题范文01-21
2016年10月22日雅思写作真题作文01-20
雅思听力真题高频句子01-22
雅思历年真题作文（精选22篇）03-27
雅思考试写作真题范文：图书馆03-28
2016年10月13日雅思写作真题范文03-27