托福TPO1综合写作材料及

时间：2023-06-04 10:44:32 托福(TOEFL) 我要投稿

相关推荐

托福TPO1综合写作材料及范文

　　托福TPO1综合写作是关于美国很多职员希望能够改一周五天，每天八小时工作制为四天工作制的。下面是小编整理的材料和范文，希望能帮到大家!

托福TPO1综合写作材料及范文

　　托福TPO1综合写作阅读材料：

　　In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day.

　　However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in　order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of　working a four-day workweek for four-fifths (80 percent) of their normal pay would benefit the　economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take　the option.

　　在美国，职员一般执行的一周五天，每天八小时工作制。然而，很多职员希望能够改为四天工作制，如果能够满足需要可以接受薪水降低。要求企业提供薪水八成工作四天的工作方式供员工选择对于国家整个经济都是有好处的，同时获益的还有个人，以及执行这个政策的公司。

　　The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more　rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring more staff to ensure that the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. In the end, companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money,which would increase company profits.

　　减少工作日会提高公司的利润，因为员工们会感到很轻松和精神，这样他们就会在工作中较少犯那些可能会带来损失的错误。为了完成同样的工作量将需要雇佣更多的人手，但是这不意味着需要支付更多的薪水，这是因为四天工作日只需支付给每个员工 80%的工资。这样，公司花同样的.钱，员工这会过于劳累和失误连连了，这样将会提高公司的利润。

　　For the country as a whole, one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates. If many full-time employees started working fewer hours,some of their workload would have to be shifted to others. Thus, for every four employees who　went on an 80 percent week, a new employee could be hired at the 80 percent rate.

　　对于国家整体来说，给职员提供这样的选择选择的好处就是可以降低失业率。如果原来全职工作的人缩短了工作时间之后，他们的部分工作就需要转给其他的员工。这样，如果每个员工每周都只工作 80%的时间，这样就可以以同样的工作时间来雇佣新员工了。

　　Finally, the option of a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees. Employees　who could afford a lower salary in exchange for more free time could improve the quality of their　lives by spending the extra time with their families, pursuing private interests, or enjoying leisure　activities.

　　最后，这种四天工作日的选择对于员工个人来说也是有利的。那些可以接受用降低薪水来增加休息时间的员工可以提高他们的生活质量，因为他们有更多的时间陪家人、追求自己的兴趣、以及享受一些休闲生活。

　　听力材料

　　在听力部分，我们可以预测到的就是这个四天工作制是没有哪个方面可以从中获益的，在听的时候我们一定要注意那些表原因的词汇，这样我们才能找到重点。

　　Offering employees the option of a four-day workweek won ’ t affect the company profits,economic conditions or the lives of employees in the ways the reading suggests.

　　给雇员提供四天工作日的选择不会像阅读部分上所说的对企业、经济状况和雇员个人的生活带来积极的影响的。

　　First, offering a four-day workweek will probably force companies to spend more, possibly a lot　more. Adding new workers means putting much more money into providing training and medical　benefits. Remember the costs of things like health benefits can be the same whether an employee　works four days or five. And having more employees also requires more office space and more computers. These additional costs would quickly cut into company profits.

　　首先，采用四小时工作制可能会对导致企业支出增加，甚至大幅增加。增加新的.员工以为这要再员工培训和医疗保险上花费更多的钱。别忘了，无论是四天工作制还是五天工作制，每个人在诸如保健福利金方面的花费是一样的。而新增的员工统一也需要更多的工位和更多的电脑。这些额外的支出很快就会影响到公司的利润。

　　Second, with respect to overall employment, it doesn ’ t follow that once some employees choose a　four-day workweek, many more jobs will become available. Hiring new workers is costly, as I　argued a moment ago. And companies have other options. They might just choose to ask their　employees to work overtime to make up the difference. Worse, companies might raise　expectations. They might start to expect that their four-day employees can do the same amount of　work they used to do in five days. If this happens, then no additional jobs will be created and　current jobs will become more unpleasant.

　　第二，至于整个社会的就业问题，也不是像阅读部分所说的，只要有雇员选择四天工作制，就会创造更多的就业机会。鉴于我刚才说的，雇佣新员工花费颇多，很多公司都另作选择了。他们可能就是要求他们的员工加班已完成任务差额。甚至公司可能会提高它们对员工效率的预期。它们可能会要求改成四天工作制的员工完成过去他们五天完成的任务。如果这样，不但没有新的工作机会，而且现有的工作也变得不那么令人愉快了。

　　Finally, while a four-day workweek offers employees more free time to invest in their personal　lives, it also presents some risks that could end up reducing their quality of life. Working a shorter week can decrease employees ’ job stability and harm their chances for advancing their careers.

　　Four-day employees are likely to be the first to lose their jobs during an economic downturn. They　may also be passed over for promotions because companies might prefer to have five-day　employees in management positions to ensure continuous coverage and consistent supervision for　the entire workweek.

　　最后，虽然四天工作日给员工更多的空闲时间去安排他们的私人生活，但是他们也会冒有一定风险，这些风险甚至可能会降低他们的生活质量。时间较短的工作制将会降低雇员工作的稳定性，同时阻碍他们事业的发展。在面临经济危机的时候，选择四天工作制的员工将会首当其冲地被裁掉。同时由于公司更倾向于把管理岗给那些五天工作的员工，这样四天工作制的员工将会错失进行集会。企业正阳的考虑是为了保证在整个工作周期中都有持续的管理覆盖和持续的监督机制。

　　托福TPO1综合写作范文1：

　　The lecturer claims that the new policy, which allows people to work four days a week instead of five, will have negative effects for companies as well as society. This claim is not in agreement with that of the reading passage, which suggests that such a policy will be beneficial.

　　According to the lecture, a company that allows employees to have fewer working hours is likely to hire more people to ensure that it meets normal levels of productivity. If this occurs, expenses for training and medical insurance will inevitably rise. The reading passage, by contrast, suggests that employees who enjoy more leisure time make fewer mistakes and work more efficiently, leading to increased profits for the enterprise.

　　The second point of difference between the lecture and the reading passage concerns the impact of the policy on the unemployment rate. The lecturer asserts that for the sake of saving money, employers might raise their expectations of 4-day employees rather than recruit more people.

　　Consequently, employees who work 4 days will be forced to finish what they did in 5 days previously, and no additional jobs will be created.

　　Finally, the lecturer argues that under the new policy, employees will experience not only decreased quality of life (as shorter working hours will translate into less pay), but also fewer chances to be promoted to supervisory positions. However, the reading passage contends that more leisure hours can create opportunities to strengthen family ties and allow employees to develop private interests, making them feel more satisfied with their lives.

　　托福TPO1综合写作范文2：

　　The passage argues that four-day work week will benefit companies, the whole economy, and　individuals. But in the lecture, the professor holds a totally different view that no one will be　beneficial from the new work week.

　　Firstly, the passage says that companies will get more profits for employees can work more　effectively. However, the lecture points out that four-day workweek will lead to spend more. That　is because companies have to spend more money on training, medical benefits, office positions,even new computers.

　　Secondly, the passage claims that the whole economy will benefit, for the four-day workweek is a　way to reduce unemployment rates. The lecture refutes the idea completely. Admittedly, there are　more available jobs, but companies will prefer to let employees work overtime to finish them for　hiring new staff is too expensive. In addition, the companies may lift their expectation that staff　finish five-day jobs within four-day.

　　Thirdly, the passage suggests that individual employees can benefit from it. Though the four-day　workweek can provide more leisure time to employees, the lecture argues against the passage.Comparing to five-day workers, the four-day workweek employees may be the first one to be fire　during economic depression. And they will have less chance to promotion because companies　wish that managers could be on duty every work day.

【托福TPO1综合写作材料及】相关文章：

托福TPO20综合写作材料及范文05-29