2017考研英语阅读解题技巧
2017考研英语阅读题应该怎样备考呢?有什么答题技巧呢?下面yjbys网小编为大家提供考研英语阅读的解题技巧，希望对大家有所帮助!
答案都在文中
总结英语阅读理解的考题题型不难发现，大部分考察的都是细节，即对文中某一段、某一句话、甚至某一个单词和短语的理解，同时也考主旨，即对整篇文章主旨大意的理解。不管是哪种考察方式，都讲究一个“准”字，也就是说，所谓的理解，都是建立在忠实于原文的基础之上的，既不会很浅显，也不会过分延伸。要想理解的精准，就必须要回到原文，答案都在文章中。正确的答案虽然不是照搬原文，但也一般是原文的另一种表达方式，不会有很大的偏差或延伸。因此，做阅读理解过程中，一定不要“脑洞大开”，天马行空地想当然，任性地做出主观臆断，老老实实回到文章中去找答案才是正解。
带着问题读文章
由于考场上时间有限，而阅读又是一项需要深耕细作的精细活儿，要想正确快速地理解文章，有时需要一些技巧。建议考研的小伙伴，做阅读理解之前先把问题快速浏览一遍，这样能对文章要讲的内容大致有了一个了解，同时又知道了问题是在问什么，然后带着这些问题去读文章，在阅读到考点所在的部位时，就能快速敏感地做出应答。不仅答题速度能提升，准确率也有保证。
巧用定位法
有时我们需要借助一些方法来快速精准地在原文中找到考察点。一般来说，一篇文章中，考点的分布是有规律可循的。比如说，考点和题目对应的顺序一般是一致的.，比如第一题的考点出现在了第二段，那么第二题的考点出现的第一段的可能性就不太大，往往是在第二段之后。当然，主旨考察题例外，它需要你读完文章有一个整体的把 握。又比如，如果题目中出现了一些比较显眼的名词或数字，寻找这些名词或数字，你也能很快在文中找到相对应的考点。再比如，文章的开头、结尾、段落转折处、举例说明处，都是比较容易出考点的地方，阅读时可以特别留意一下。
拓展阅读：2017考研英语阅读材料:Those who can
IMAGINE a job where excellence does nothing to improve your pay or chances of promotion, and failure carries little risk of being sacked. Your pay is low for your qualifications―but at least the holidays are long, and the pension is gold-plated.
Teaching ought to be a profession for hard-working altruists who want to improve children's life prospects. But all too often school systems seem designed to attract mediocre timeservers. Many Mexican teachers have inherited their jobs; Brazilian ones earn less than other public servants, and retire much earlier. Each school-day a quarter of Indian teachers play truant. In New York it is so hard to sack teachers that even those accused of theft or assault may be parked away from pupils, doing “administrative tasks” on full pay, sometimes for years.
You can find outstanding individuals in the worst school systems. But, as lazy and incompetent teachers get away with slacking, the committed ones often lose motivation. In America and Britain surveys find plummeting morale. Jaded British teachers on online forums remind each other that it is just a few months till the long summer break―and just a few years till retirement. No wonder so many children struggle to learn: no school can be better than those who work in it.
Yet it is possible to persuade the hardworking and ambitious to teach. Finland pays teachers modestly but manages them well; ten graduates apply for each training place. South Korea recruits teachers from the top 5% of school-leavers and promises them fat pay cheques. In both countries teachers are revered―and results are among the world's best.
Even where the profession is in disrepute, high-flyers can be lured into the classroom. Teach for America, which sends star graduates from elite universities for two-year stints in rough schools, is being copied around the globe. Private employers snap up its alumni―but many stay in teaching. Teach First, Britain's version, has helped raise standards in London and is one of the country's most prestigious graduate employers. Such schemes are small, but show that when teaching is recast as tough and rewarding, the right sort clamour to join.
Spreading the revolution to the entire profession will mean dumping the perks cherished by slackers and setting terms that appeal to the hardworking. That may well mean higher pay―but also less generous pensions and holidays. Why not encourage teachers to use the long vacation for catch-up classes for pupils who have fallen behind? Stiffer entry requirements would raise the job's status and attract better applicants. Pay rises should reward excellence, not long service. Underperformers should be shown the door.
Standing in the way, almost everywhere, are the union s. Their willingness to back shirkers over strivers should not be underestimated: in Washington, DC, when the schools boss (a Teach for America alumna) offered teachers much higher pay in return for less job security, their union balked.
But against the union s is a growing coalition: the leaders in public administration and private enterprise who have been through Teach for America and its ilk. They know what it takes to succeed in difficult schools, and what it would take for success to become the norm. They know that what good teachers want most of all is good colleagues. As they become more numerous and influential, they need to argue for a new deal for teachers. The good ones deserve it―and pupils do, too.
参考译文:
想象一下，一个工作卓越人士无须做什么事情即可提高你的工资或晋升的机会，出现故障被解雇的风险很小。你的工资低于你的资历，但至少假期长，养老金是“镀金”般有保障的。
教学应该是一个为想要改善儿童的生活前景勤劳的利他主义者的专业。但很多时候学校系统似乎旨在吸引平庸的趋炎附势之人。许多墨西哥教师继承了他们的工作;巴西那些教师收入低于其他公务人员，并提前退休了。每所学校一天四分之一的印度教师罢工。在纽约很难解雇教师，即使是那些被指控偷窃或侵犯远离学生的教师，有时多年全薪做“管理任务”。
您可以在最恶劣的学校系统找到先进个人。但是，由于懒惰和无能的教师逃脱松弛，负责的教师往往失去动力。在美国和英国的调查发现士气一落千丈。在网上论坛疲倦不堪的的英国老师提醒对方，坚持到漫长的暑假仅仅只有短短数月，并且直到退休只有短短几年。难怪这么多孩子努力学习：没有学校可以比那些孩子在这工作得更好。
然而，有可能说服勤奋和雄心勃勃的教导者。芬兰支付教师的薪酬不多，但他们善于管理; 10名毕业生申请每次实习的地方。韩国从高中毕业生中排名前5%里抽取学生进行教师招聘，并承诺他们充沛的工资。在这两个国家的教师受到崇敬――其结果是世界上最好的。
即使在专业是声名狼藉，成功人士可以被引诱成为教师。为美国而教，使得精英大学的星级毕业生两年都就职于水平较差的学校，这种情况在全球各地都在效仿出现。人雇主抢购校友，但很多都停留在教学。教育首先，英国方面，有助于提高在伦敦标准，伦敦是全国最负盛名的毕业生的雇主之一。这些计划虽小，但是显示当教育被改写为坚韧和奖励，学校将会进行正确排序。
传播革命理念给整个行业将意味着被逃避工作之人和头脑清醒者所珍视并吸引勤劳者珍惜的额外津贴。这可能意味着更高的薪水――也不太丰厚的退休金和节假日。为什么不鼓励教师利用长假对已经落后的学生进行补课教育?更严厉的入学要求会提高工作的地位和吸引更好的申请人。加薪应奖励优秀者，而非长期的工作服务。表现不佳应该被扫地出门。
路上，几乎无处不在是工会组织。他们卸责于奋斗者之上的意愿不容小觑：在华盛顿，当学校的老板(一个做教师，校友)提供教师高得多的薪酬以换取较少的工作保障，他们的工会犹豫不决。
但对工会是一个不断增长的联盟：在公共管理和民营企业的领导者经历过为美国和其同类而教授。他们知道如何才能在困难的学校成功，怎样做才能成功成为常态。他们知道，好教师最希望的还是不错的同事。当他们变得越来越多，具有影响力，他们需要争取教师的新协议。好人应该得到它，学生们也同样如此。