GMAT优秀作文备考相关内容
The following appeared as part of an article in a popular science magazine.
Scientists must typically work 60 to 80 hours a week if they hope to further their careers; consequently, good and affordable allday child care must be made available to both male and female scientists if they are to advance in their fields. Moreover, requirements for career advancement must be made more flexible so that preschool-age children can spend a significant portion of each day with a parent.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
This editorial argues that, since career advancement for scientists typically requires 60 to 80 hours of work per week, affordable all-day child care must be made available to scientists of both genders if they are to advance in their fields. Moreover, the editorial urges that requirements for career advancement be made more flexible to insure that pre-school children can spend a significant amount of time each day with a parent. This argument is problematic in two crucial respects.
The major problem with the view expressed in the article is that inconsistent recommendations are endorsed in the argument. On the one hand, scientists are urged to put their children in all-day child-care facilities in order to advance their careers. On the other hand, they are encouraged to spend a significant amount of time each day with their children. Obviously, scientists cannot be expected to adhere to both of these recommendations.
【GMAT优秀作文备考相关内容】相关文章：
GMAT备考优秀作文01-28
备考GMAT优秀作文01-28
gmat优秀作文作文备考07-23
GMAT优秀作文备考精选08-05
备考指南GMAT优秀作文01-30
GMAT备考优秀作文精选01-29
备考资料GMAT优秀作文01-29
GMAT优秀作文备考资料07-26
GMAT作文优秀备考资料07-26